It is inconceivable to have a value-free sociology, unlike many natural sciences, because each social theorist, student, and researcher has a unique set of values to which he or she adheres or aspires, which influences his or her social scientific viewpoints and academic outputs.
• Humanist, Marxist, and other -isms, -asms, or philosophies influenced and continue to influence sociology’s development as a social science.
• While a value-free sociology is not possible, it is neither desirable nor necessary, as “value-free” is neither a prerequisite for nor an impediment to true scientific endeavor.
• Anyone who claims to be a value-free sociologist is lying. Declare your life and religious philosophy up front so that your audience can make up their own minds and make the necessary adjustments to your sociological approach.
• That said, sociology adheres to and follows objective scientific methods and empirical research, which are largely “value-free” and will produce nearly value-free measurable results.
What exactly is science?
• Science is defined as the “development of a body of knowledge about a particular subject matter through systematic methods of empirical investigation, data analysis, theoretical thinking, and logical assessment of arguments.”
Certain criteria can be used to qualify a discipline as a science, such as:
Science’s litmus test
- Inter-subjective consistency
- Value-free and objective
- Theoretical Orientation and Universal Testability
- When values provide direct motivation to accept or reject a theory, they play a direct role.
- When they evaluate the consequences of accepting or rejecting a claim, they play an indirect role.
- influencing what constitutes sufficient evidence for acceptance or rejection.
- This concept revolves around the question of whether sociologists can study the social world or not.
- in a way that prevents the researcher’s personal values from influencing the research’s outcome.
- In a sense, it’s not a question of whether the sociologist has values (since, by definition, everyone does).
- Humans develop a value system of some sort).
- Science is not value-free, but it can be protected from the effects of inappropriate values if scientists take steps to mitigate their impact.
- One step is to differentiate between direct and indirect value roles.
- Another is the formulation of individual scientist-specific guidelines.
As a value-free science, sociology
- Values are an important part of any study.
- They can be found in:
- Choosing an object to analyze
- In the manner in which it is approached
- In the questions that were asked
- When it comes to data selection
- When it comes to data interpretation
- In the responses that are provided.
- In that sense, there is no such thing as a value-free science.
- Rather, it’s a question of how much such personal values influence or don’t influence production.
- a body of knowledge about a society as a whole or about specific aspects of that society
- In this sense, value-freedom refers to the question of whether or not a sociologist can be independent.
- They are personally objective when it comes to their research.
According to Comte, sociology has key features of science, including:
• Research methods
• Subject matter, for example.
Furthermore, sociology can be evaluated in the context of a broader scientific framework as follows:
• Inter-subjective consistency
• It refers to the likelihood that other researchers would be able to achieve the same results if they were to replicate one’s findings.
• Sociology has concepts that have universal meanings, regardless of who is conducting the research. Example:
Religion and family.
• Value-free and objective
- To a large extent, this is also possible. Objectivity, according to Weber, can be achieved through methods such as
- ‘Verstehen’ and ‘Ideal types’ are two terms that come to mind.
• Durkheim proposed “indirect experimentation” as a means of demonstrating the empirical validity of social theories.
• Theoretical orientation and generalizations
• To some extent, it is also possible.
For example, both Durkheim’s and Parsons’ theories of religion and social systems claimed to be universal theories, with incest being taboo.etc.
• Social phenomena can be observed, whether directly or indirectly—social Durkheim’s facts and Weber’s Ideal are two examples.
• Scales of sociometer, schedules, questionnaires, interviews, case histories, comparisons, and other scientific methods are used in sociology.
Why is sociology not considered a science?
• When compared to natural sciences, sociology has some limitations in terms of empiricism, testability, universal theories, and absolute objectivity.
• MAX WEBER – subject matter difference (human beings have consciousness). As a result, sociology is a science in and of itself.
• Natural sciences prefer factual statements, whereas social sciences prefer value statements.
• Neo-Kantians Wilhelm Windelband and Heinrich Rickert introduced the concepts of nomothetic (fact-based).
idiographic (based on a tendency to specify/ subjective interpretations/ empiricism) and idiographic (based on a tendency to generalize)
suitable for the humanities).
• As a result, the methodology, approach to knowledge, and theorizing in social science differs.
• To understand social phenomena, Erving Goffman and GH Mead took different approaches.
• It does, however, have some limitations, which are as follows:
• It’s challenging to be empirical.
• It’s difficult to be inductive and universal at the same time.
• Humans are conscious beings (non-positivism)
• Objectivity and value neutrality are difficult to achieve.
• However, when viewed as a method of investigation, sociology meets the criteria for classification as a science.
• In sociology, scientific method is less concerned with the empirical nature of the study and more concerned with the content of the study.
methodology. As a result, it cannot become a natural science, but it can become a social science.
“Science is science, whether it is sociology or biology,” Stuart Chaze said.
• As a result, sociology as a science can be viewed as follows: –
• Research methods (positivism vs. non-positivism)
• Insight (critical)
• What is the goal? (to know the truth)
• Resultant Consequences (curiosity and solving the problem)
• Max Weber argued that while complete value-freedom was impossible (because all human actors, by definition, have values),
He did argue, however, that it was possible for people to have values and that all human interaction is based on value judgments)
For latest Articles [Paper wise GS 1-4] and Solved papers[2010-2020] join us @ https://t.me/UPSCexamNotes1
UPSC ESSAYS click here
GS Paper 1 click here
Gs Paper 2 click here
Gs paper 3 click here
GS paper 4 click here
Sociology click here