Folks hope to have a greater training, well being and housing by reforming the structure
One hopes for a “legit” structure, the opposite believes Chile’s issues could be resolved and not using a new one — two voters on reverse sides lay out their arguments forward of Sunday’s referendum, and say the selection going through the nation is a difficult one.
‘Ethics and legitimacy’
Ernesto Quintana says he’ll be ticking “Apruebo” (I agree) for “causes of ethics and legitimacy” when he will get to his Santiago polling heart on Sunday.
The present structure, he says, prevents social progress.
“The present structure….was written through the dictatorship, a interval of restriction of freedoms, with out participation of the residents, after all, and within the context of terror,” Quintana, a Santiago-based psychologist, advised AFP.
“It’s a structure that favors the neo-liberal system at an excessive stage, it has perpetuated a completely unequal system,” stated the 38-year-old, who has taken half in a number of mass demonstrations within the capital because the starting of the social disaster in October 2019.
Not a member of any political grouping, he says he desires well being and training — basically the duty of the non-public sector within the copper-rich South American nation — to turn out to be basic rights enshrined within the structure.
“At present individuals who have cash have higher training, higher well being, higher housing, ….and all these items could possibly be reformed by altering the structure.”
The son of communist militants hunted down underneath Augusto Pinochet, Chile’s army ruler between 1973-1990, Quintana will even vote for a brand new constitution to be drafted by a “Constituent Conference” composed solely of elected residents, and never by a “combined conference” that will mix residents with lawmakers.
“I do not need the political events to be concerned,” stated Quintana, who merely would not belief the nation’s politicians to do the job.
He sees the Constituent Conference “as a possibility for the voice of all residents to be taken under consideration in a extra direct, extra participatory means.”
Santiago restauranteur Francisco Pereira is eager to level out that being towards a re-write of the structure and voting “Rechazo” (I reject) would not makes one pro-Pinochet.
He agrees that Chile wants “change” and particularly extra egalitarian well being, training and transport programs.
He says he even “applauded” when Chileans first took to the streets in October final yr to demand extra social justice.
For him, nevertheless, the demonstrators have been gathering “to alter legal guidelines, to enhance pensions, to denounce inequalities typically,” however not particularly to alter the structure.
The 48-year-old stresses that he has “all the time been towards Pinochet, towards the dictatorship”. However he says that in an ideal storm of social disaster, violent demonstrations and the coronavirus pandemic which has hit Chile so exhausting, the timing is just not proper to alter such a basic pillar of the legislation.
“The issue is that we’re deciding to alter the structure in a second of disaster, and it is not a great foundation on which to base altering the structure,’ he stated.
“Chile doesn’t want constitutional change for the time being, like each different nation on this planet, it is in the midst of a critical financial disaster.”
“Social reforms require cash, and the instability” — because of the referendum and social tensions — “shouldn’t be very engaging for funding, for progress.”
Lawmakers ought to benefit from the sort of political consensus displayed in Congress final November when left and right-wing blocs signed an settlement to carry the referendum.
“Earlier than wanting to alter the structure, we should first resolve issues by way of the legislation,” by voting reforms by way of Congress, Pereira stated.