Best-kept secret? Concerns raised by Australian authorities about Google show mapping risks

Greatest-kept secret? Considerations raised by Australian authorities about Google present mapping dangers

GS paper 3

BANGKOK: A request by Australian authorities for Google to take away images of the highest of a sacred indigenous website has sparked a debate on how you can higher shield such locations and whether or not mapping instruments are growing privateness and conservation dangers.

Parks Australia, which is chargeable for the nationwide park the place Uluru is positioned, final month objected to the Google Avenue View instrument that allowed customers to just about stroll on its summit – which was closed to vacationers in 2019 after a decades-long marketing campaign by indigenous communities.

The photographs that have been thought of to defy the ban have been contributed by customers, and have been eliminated, a Google spokesman stated.

“We perceive Uluru-Kata Tjuta Nationwide Park is deeply sacred to the Anangu individuals,” he stated. “As quickly as Parks Australia raised their issues about this person contribution, we eliminated the imagery.”

Whereas many of the practically 20 million contributions to Google Maps every day are “actually useful”, there are some that violate insurance policies, he stated, including that greater than 10 million pictures and three million movies have been eliminated final 12 months.

Governments and know-how firms are mapping a lot of the Earth with satellite tv for pc imagery, drones and digital actuality to modernise land data or for digital excursions.

However in doing so, they could be placing indigenous communities or these dwelling in casual settlements at better danger of eviction, unlawful logging and different threats, human rights campaigners and mappers say.

“Once we prepare indigenous communities on mapping, we inform them: ‘bear in mind this information will likely be public, so consider carefully about what you wish to add’,” stated Harry Machmud, head of the non-profit Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Group in Indonesia.

“If there’s a sacred forest or neighborhood land they wish to hold from public view, or neighborhood borders which are delicate – maybe these shouldn’t be up to date on the maps,” he stated.

Applied sciences corresponding to digital actuality (VR) and augmented actuality (AR), which use cameras, microphones and different sensors additionally inevitably gather information that may be misused, stated Rory Mir, an organiser with digital rights group Digital Frontier Basis.

“We’re speaking about 1000’s of pictures and movies being aggregated by a central service, and permitting for the monitoring of people,” Mir stated.

Firms corresponding to Google blur faces and licence plates to guard privateness. However there are “many different methods to determine people, from their gait to their tattoos”, stated Mir, including that there should at all times be an choice to request removing of information.

“Customers needs to be in full management of how their non-public areas are recorded, and the way this information is used,” Mir advised the Thomson Reuters Basis on Monday.

“With out significant person consent and restrictions on the gathering, a menacing future might take form the place common individuals utilizing VR and AR additional proliferate surveillance in private and non-private areas.”


Supply hyperlink