NEW DELHI: A Delhi courtroom on Saturday requested former Union minister M J Akbar and journalist Priya Ramani whether or not there was an opportunity of settlement between them in a legal defamation grievance filed by him towards her.
Akbar had filed the grievance towards Ramani for allegedly defaming him by accusing him of sexual misconduct round 20 years in the past when he was a journalist.
Ramani had mentioned the allegations towards Akbar, made within the wake of #MeToo motion in 2018, had been her fact and had been made in public good.
Extra Chief Metropolitan Justice of the Peace (ACMM) Ravindra Kumar Pandey posed the question on Saturday as he began listening to afresh the ultimate arguments within the case because the earlier decide listening to the matter was transferred to a different courtroom on Wednesday.
Senior advocate Geeta Luthra, showing for Akbar, mentioned she wanted time to speak to her shopper earlier than making a call on the problem.
The counsel for Ramani, advocate Bhavook Chauhan, mentioned there was much less probability of any settlement because the details of the case had been peculiar.
The courtroom requested each the events to reply on the purpose of settlement and get again on November 24, the following date of listening to.
The earlier decide, ACMM Vishal Pahuja, had began listening to the ultimate arguments within the case on February 7 this yr.
Akbar had filed the legal defamation grievance towards Ramani in October 15, 2018.
He resigned as Union minister on October 17, 2018.
Akbar had earlier advised the courtroom that Ramani had defamed him by calling him adjectives equivalent to ‘media’s greatest predator’ that harmed his popularity.
He has denied all of the allegations of sexual harassment by ladies who got here ahead throughout #MeToo marketing campaign towards him.
Over 20 ladies got here up with accounts of the alleged sexual harassment by M J Akbar whereas they had been working as journalists below him.
He termed the allegations “false, fabricated and deeply distressin” and mentioned he was taking applicable authorized motion towards them.